Apply Now Programmes Virtual Tour CT-SET 2026 Ph.D
Admissions
Open 2026-27
Apply now
Apply Now

17 Sep, 2025

Inter-school Debate competition on Suicide Prevention

School: School of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts

The event began with a welcome address by the faculty coordinator, who highlighted the significance of the topic and the purpose of the debate. This was followed by the formal introduction of the judges and the briefing of rules. The competition was divided into two rounds: the preliminary and the final.

In the preliminary round, all 26 participants representing different schools of the university presented their arguments within the allotted time. After a rigorous session, the judges shortlisted participants for the final round, where the debate intensified with stronger counterarguments and thought-provoking perspectives. The final session concluded with a closing statement by the judges, who summarized the major insights of the discussion and shared their observations. The event ended with the announcement of winners and a formal vote of thanks.

Objectives of the Orientation
1.    To create awareness among students about suicide prevention as a pressing social and psychological issue.

2.    To encourage critical thinking on the causes, consequences, and strategies related to suicide prevention.

3.    To provide a platform for students to express their perspectives and engage in meaningful dialogue.

4.    To strengthen students’ public speaking, reasoning, and debating skills.

5.    To promote constructive discussion on sensitive topics in an academic setting.

6.    To sensitize participants and the audience towards mental health concerns.

7.    To break the stigma associated with seeking help for psychological issues.

8.    To reinforce the role of students as responsible individuals contributing to a supportive academic and social environment.

Student Feedback
The students highly appreciated the event and described it as an enriching experience. Participants shared that the debate not only helped them improve their debating skills but also gave them an opportunity to explore the issue of suicide prevention from multiple angles—psychological, social, cultural, and policy-related. Many students expressed that the competition helped them build confidence in public speaking and sharpen their ability to construct logical arguments under pressure.

The audience also found the debate engaging and impactful, as it raised awareness about the importance of mental health, peer support, and preventive strategies. Students acknowledged that such academic activities make learning more meaningful by linking classroom knowledge with real-world issues. Overall, the debate was described as insightful, awareness-driven, and motivating for future participation.
 

More Like This